Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Journal of Clinical & Aesthetic Dermatology ; 15(5):10-10, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1842730
3.
Journal of Clinical & Aesthetic Dermatology ; 14(9):7-7, 2021.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1439102
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(1): 113-121, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination have been commonly reported; however, histopathologic features and clinical correlations have not been well characterized. METHODS: We evaluated for a history of skin biopsy all reports of reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccination identified in an international registry. When histopathology reports were available, we categorized them by reaction patterns. RESULTS: Of 803 vaccine reactions reported, 58 (7%) cases had biopsy reports available for review. The most common histopathologic reaction pattern was spongiotic dermatitis, which clinically ranged from robust papules with overlying crust, to pityriasis rosea-like eruptions, to pink papules with fine scale. We propose the acronym "V-REPP" (vaccine-related eruption of papules and plaques) for this spectrum. Other clinical patterns included bullous pemphigoid-like (n = 12), dermal hypersensitivity (n = 4), herpes zoster (n = 4), lichen planus-like (n = 4), pernio (n = 3), urticarial (n = 2), neutrophilic dermatosis (n = 2), leukocytoclastic vasculitis (n = 2), morbilliform (n = 2), delayed large local reactions (n = 2), erythromelalgia (n = 1), and other (n = 5). LIMITATIONS: Cases in which histopathology was available represented a minority of registry entries. Analysis of registry data cannot measure incidence. CONCLUSION: Clinical and histopathologic correlation allowed for categorization of cutaneous reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine. We propose defining a subset of vaccine-related eruption of papules and plaques, as well as 12 other patterns, following COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 , Exanthema , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , COVID-19/prevention & control , Exanthema/chemically induced , Humans , Registries
5.
Dermatol Clin ; 39(4): 569-574, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1330741

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus Disease 2019 disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic/Latino populations. Racial disparities inherently exist in dermatology because of underrepresentation of skin of color populations in literature, reduced access to care for minority populations, and low diversity within the specialty of dermatology itself. Lack of imagery in dermatology can have detrimental consequences for patients of color. Dermatologists should note and disseminate cutaneous manifestations of patients of color to combat current racial imbalances.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/ethnology , Cultural Diversity , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Skin Diseases/ethnology , Black People/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , Health Status Disparities , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Skin Diseases/diagnosis
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(1): 46-55, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171221

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after messenger RNA (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines have been reported but are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphology and timing of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A provider-facing registry-based study collected cases of cutaneous manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: From December 2020 to February 2021, we recorded 414 cutaneous reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna (83%) and Pfizer (17%). Delayed large local reactions were most common, followed by local injection site reactions, urticarial eruptions, and morbilliform eruptions. Forty-three percent of patients with first-dose reactions experienced second-dose recurrence. Additional less common reactions included pernio/chilblains, cosmetic filler reactions, zoster, herpes simplex flares, and pityriasis rosea-like reactions. LIMITATIONS: Registry analysis does not measure incidence. Morphologic misclassification is possible. CONCLUSIONS: We report a spectrum of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We observed some dermatologic reactions to Moderna and Pfizer vaccines that mimicked SARS-CoV-2 infection itself, such as pernio/chilblains. Most patients with first-dose reactions did not have a second-dose reaction and serious adverse events did not develop in any of the patients in the registry after the first or second dose. Our data support that cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are generally minor and self-limited, and should not discourage vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Adult , Drug Eruptions/epidemiology , Female , Global Health , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries
10.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(4): 1118-1129, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-628238

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has associated cutaneous manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the diversity of cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 and facilitate understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. METHODS: Case series from an international registry from the American Academy of Dermatology and International League of Dermatological Societies. RESULTS: The registry collected 716 cases of new-onset dermatologic symptoms in patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19. Of the 171 patients in the registry with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, the most common morphologies were morbilliform (22%), pernio-like (18%), urticarial (16%), macular erythema (13%), vesicular (11%), papulosquamous (9.9%), and retiform purpura (6.4%). Pernio-like lesions were common in patients with mild disease, whereas retiform purpura presented exclusively in ill, hospitalized patients. LIMITATIONS: We cannot estimate incidence or prevalence. Confirmation bias is possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the array of cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19. Many morphologies were nonspecific, whereas others may provide insight into potential immune or inflammatory pathways in COVID-19 pathophysiology.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Skin Diseases/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/virology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL